Connect with us

Red Pill

News

George Clooney is trying to protect his $220M fortune before his wedding. Why put yourself in harms way George?

George Clooney‘s upcoming marriage to fiancee/London lawyer Amal Alamuddin is getting a bit shaky. The root of the problem is reported ‘fighting’ over Clooney’s $220 million fortune and the prenup being drafted by Clooney’s legal team to protect his assets in case of well…

Published

on

0 Views

Why would George Clooney ever get married! No need to explain this any further. Any man in his enviable position should know by now that marriage (especially under American law) is about the riskiest endeavour a super high SMV alpha male could possibly undertake.
While we hope for the best for George, we have hunch that (judging from the long list of great men destroyed by marriage before him) this will not end well.

Radar online reports that trouble is already starting to brew even before Clooney signs away his life…

George Clooney‘s upcoming nuptials to fiancee Amal Alamuddin is turning out to be disastrous — a prenup the couple has been arguing over, worries about a guest list feud and their wedding planner quitting — and the couple might not even make it down the aisle!
A new report from The National ENQUIRER claims the Hollywood playboy has been negotiating and “fighting” with soon-to-be wife‘s legal team over a $220 million wedding contract.

Of course coming from The National ENQUIRER, we do need to take these reports with a large grain of salt, but also taking into effect that Clooney is worth gobs of money and about as high on the Social Market Value chain as you can get, marriage leaves him wide open for a major fall…unless of course he can put together a rock solid prenup.

“Clooney is worth an estimated $220 million. Given his shaky track record with women over the years, including a difficult divorce from his first wife and the brief longevity of most Hollywood marriages in general, I think he needs to make sure he has a prenuptial agreement that’s ironclad,” divorce attorney Raoul L. Felder told The ENQUIRER.
“He has a lot to worry about and a lot to lose if he doesn’t proceed with the utmost care and caution. The fact that (his fiancee) is a lawyer is strike one against him. I expect his lawyers are being very careful and ‘fighting’ her lawyers over every point.”
Indeed, Alamuddin’s intellect and successful career was an attraction for Clooney, but now it may work against him.

I would worry less about Alamuddin’s intellect and more about divorce laws in the U.S.A. if I was Clooney.
Once the marriage papers are signed all leverage and power in the relationship transfers over to Alamuddin, and then the real fun for Clooney begins. Clooney has given up the most precious asset he had as an alpha male…his freedom.
References:
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2014/08/george-clooney-wedding-disaster-prenup-guest-list-planner-quit/

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
23 Comments

23
Leave a Reply

avatar
23 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
0 Comment authors
cheap car quotesxfwmrt5gzngfw5wtrjfgxe85mrwfqdcm59x4ctxckw54mtdfsgw9j5nwmtxt5m8ct4ykwk7rdywx8t54w5ctxsdfseks izle Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Infos here: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

this is really a nice post.
I saw this really great post today.

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Infos here: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Informations here: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

ccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb
[…]below you’ll uncover the link to some sites that we feel you need to visit[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 35685 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Informations here: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 36048 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

xcmwnv54ec8tnv5cev5jfdcnv5
[…]Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine some unrelated data, nevertheless definitely really worth taking a appear, whoa did one particular find out about Mid East has got far more problerms as well […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 27184 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

Title
[…]Sites of interest we’ve a link to[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 31635 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/george-clooneys-trying-protect-220m-fortune-wedding-put-harms-way-george/ […]

trackback

Title
[…]usually posts some very fascinating stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[…]

trackback

Title
[…]the time to study or go to the subject material or web sites we’ve linked to below the[…]

trackback

Title
[…]one of our visitors not long ago recommended the following website[…]

trackback

Title
[…]that would be the end of this post. Here you’ll come across some sites that we assume you will value, just click the links over[…]

Latest

James Woods Suspended From Twitter Over Satirical Meme That Could “Impact An Election”

James Woods crushes Jack Dorsey: “You are a coward, @Jack.”

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


Outspoken conservative actor James Woods was suspended from posting to Twitter over a two-month-old satirical meme which very clearly parodies a Democratic advertisement campaign. While the actor’s tweets are still visible, he is unable to post new content.

The offending tweet from July 20, features three millennial-aged men with “nu-male smiles” and text that reads “We’re making a Woman’s Vote Worth more by staying home.” Above it, Woods writes “Pretty scary that there is a distinct possibility this could be real. Not likely, but in this day and age of absolute liberal insanity, it is at least possible.”

According to screenshots provided by an associate of Woods’, Twitter directed the actor to delete the post on the grounds that it contained “text and imagery that has the potential to be misleading in a way that could impact an election.

In other words, James Woods, who has approximately 1.72 million followers, was suspended because liberals who don’t identify as women might actually take the meme seriously and not vote. 

In a statement released through associate Sara Miller, Woods said “You are a coward, @Jack,” referring to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. “There is no free speech for Conservatives on @Twitter.

Earlier this month, Woods opined on the mass-platform ban of Alex Jones, tweeting: ““I’ve never read Alex Jones nor watched any of his video presence on the internet. A friend told me he was an extremist. Believe me that I know nothing about him. That said, I think banning him from the internet is a slippery slope. This is the beginning of real fascism. Trust me.”

Nu-males everywhere non-threateningly smirk at Woods’ bad fortune…

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

This Man’s Incredible Story Proves Why Due Process Matters In The Kavanaugh Case

Accused of rape by a fellow student, Brian Banks accepted a plea deal and went to prison on his 18th birthday. Years later he was exonerated.

The Duran

Published

on

Authored by James Miller of The Political Insider:


Somewhere between the creation of the Magna Carta and now, leftists have forgotten why due process matters; and in some cases, such as that of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, they choose to outright ignore the judicial and civil rights put in place by the U.S. Constitution.

In this age of social media justice mobs, the accused are often convicted in the court of (liberal) public opinion long before any substantial evidence emerges to warrant an investigation or trial. This is certainly true for Kavanaugh. His accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, cannot recall the date of the alleged assault and has no supporting witnesses, yet law professors are ready to ruin his entire life and career. Not because they genuinely believe he’s guilty, but because he’s a pro-life Trump nominee for the Supreme Court.

It goes without saying: to “sink Kavanaugh even if” Ford’s allegation is untrue is unethical, unconstitutional, and undemocratic. He has a right to due process, and before liberals sharpen their pitchforks any further they would do well to remember what happened to Brian Banks.

In the summer of 2002, Banks was a highly recruited 16-year-old linebacker at Polytechnic High School in California with plans to play football on a full scholarship to the University of Southern California. However, those plans were destroyed when Banks’s classmate, Wanetta Gibson, claimed that Banks had dragged her into a stairway at their high school and raped her.

Gibson’s claim was false, but it was Banks’s word against hers. Banks had two options: go to trial and risk spending 41 years-to-life in prison, or take a plea deal that included five years in prison, five years probation, and registering as a sex offender. Banks accepted the plea deal under the counsel of his lawyer, who told him that he stood no chance at trial because the all-white jury would “automatically assume” he was guilty because he was a “big, black teenager.”

Gibson and her mother subsequently sued the Long Beach Unified School District and won a $1.5 million settlement. It wasn’t until nearly a decade later, long after Banks’s promising football career had already been tanked, that Gibson admitted she’d fabricated the entire story.

Following Gibson’s confession, Banks was exonerated with the help of the California Innocence Project. Hopeful to get his life back on track, he played for Las Vegas Locomotives of the now-defunct United Football League in 2012 and signed with the Atlanta Falcons in 2013. But while Banks finally received justice, he will never get back the years or the prospective pro football career that Gibson selfishly stole from him.

Banks’ story is timely, and it serves as a powerful warning to anyone too eager to condemn those accused of sexual assault. In fact, a film about Banks’s ordeal, Brian Banks, is set to premiere at the Los Angeles Film Festival next week.

Perhaps all the #MeToo Hollywood elites and their liberal friends should attend the screening – and keep Kavanaugh in their minds as they watch.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

“Transphobic” Swedish Professor May Lose Job After Noting Biological Differences Between Sexes

A university professor in Sweden is under investigation after he said that there are fundamental differences between men and women which are “biologically founded”

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


A university professor in Sweden is under investigation for “anti-feminism” and “transphobia” after he said that there are fundamental differences between men and women which are “biologically founded” and that genders cannot be regarded as “social constructs alone,” reports Academic Rights Watch.

For his transgression, Germund Hesslow – a professor of neuroscience at Lund University – who holds dual PhDs in philosophy and neurophysiology, may lose his job – telling RT that a “full investigation” has been ordered, and that there “have been discussions about trying to stop the lecture or get rid of me, or have someone else give the lecture or not give the lecture at all.”

“If you answer such a question you are under severe time pressure, you have to be extremely brief — and I used wording which I think was completely innocuous, and that apparently the student didn’t,” Hesslow said.

Hesslow was ordered to attend a meeting by Christer Larsson, chairman of the program board for medical education, after a female student complained that Hesslow had a “personal anti-feminist agenda.” He was asked to distance himself from two specific comments; that gay women have a “male sexual orientation” and that the sexual orientation of transsexuals is “a matter of definition.”

The student’s complaint reads in part (translated):

I have also heard from senior lecturers that Germund Hesslow at the last lecture expressed himself transfobically. In response to a question of transexuallism, he said something like “sex change is a fly”. Secondly, it is outrageous because there may be students during the lecture who are themselves exposed to transfobin, but also because it may affect how later students in their professional lives meet transgender people. Transpersonals already have a high level of overrepresentation in suicide statistics and there are already major shortcomings in the treatment of transgender in care, should not it be countered? How does this kind of statement coincide with the university’s equal treatment plan? What has this statement given for consequences? What has been done for this to not be repeated? –Academic Rights Watch

After being admonished, Hesslow refused to distance himself from his comments, saying that he had “done enough” already and didn’t have to explain and defend his choice of words.

At some point, one must ask for a sense of proportion among those involved. If it were to become acceptable for students to record lectures in order to find compromising formulations and then involve faculty staff with meetings and long letters, we should let go of the medical education altogether,” Hesslow said in a written reply to Larsson.

He also rejected the accusation that he had a political agenda – stating that his only agenda was to let scientific factnot new social conventions, dictate how he teaches his courses.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending