Connect with us

Red Pill

News

Why being “marriage material” is the kiss of death for any man

Many red flags come along to signal that something in your life is amiss. Some flags are subtle, others flags are more overt. One red flag that all beta men should recognise as a massive clue to reverse course, and swallow that red pill, is when women call you marriage material.

Published

on

156 Views

Every red pill man knows that the journey to enlightenment and truth usually passes through beta male heartbreak. Some men are simply born red pill, while others kind of fall into it without even knowing their luck, but the majority of us usually decide to swallow the pill after one or more countless ‘nice guy,’ beta bucks, alpha fucks scenarios.

Many markers and red flags come along to signal that something in your life is amiss. Some flags are subtle, like an innocent goodnight kiss after gorging an absurd amount of cash on a female crush. Other times the flags are left hooks straight to the jaw, like watching that very same female crush make out with the neck tattooed, barman, she just meet two minutes ago.

Usually the subtle flags are a prelude to the left hooks. One flag that all beta males should recognise as a massive clue to reverse course, and swallow that red pill is when women call you ‘marriage material.’

What most men need to realise is that women essentially label men into one of two buckets…resource provider or tingle giver.

Resource providers are the guys that hear the “marriage material” line form women ad nauseum. They are the men who are lucky enough to finally get the girl after waiting years (sometimes decades) for her to come around and realize what a great catch he is.

Hearing those sweat words from girl friends (yes, friends that are girls, not the other way around) lips, ‘you’re so nice, I’m sure you’ll end up with a great girl in the end.’ is the ‘marriage material’ kiss of death.

When a women, any women (sister, mother, cousin, crush, neighbour, you name it) says some ‘marriage material’ crap like the above, that means you are beta male material, not worth the lay, but totally worth the resources and security you can provide at a later date decided at her discretion.

You’re ‘marriage material’ is the ultimate, subtle, red flag insult any women can give you. Take pride and be happy when you hear these words spoken to you, you now know that it is time to change.

You have a low social value and are not giving off the sexy vibe you should be emitting.  It’s time to refocus on you, a better, higher value version of you. Women will take notice when you begin focusing on what makes you happy, not what makes them happy.

Only then will you fall into the tingle giver bucket. This is where you want to be. When women call you an asshole, label you as cocky, or chide you on your over-the-top confidence, you know you are on the right path.

This is where the ‘marriage material’ line, becomes the ‘you’re are totally bad for me’ or ‘I would never take you home to mom and dad’ statement. You are giving her the tingles that overcome her every thought and desire for better judgement. You have broken through the most private and deep barrier of resistance, and entered her subconscious world contradictory emotions.

In a different time and past era, being ‘marriage material’ was a seen as a good thing, before the third phase of feminism kicked in and decided that blue pill men were better utilised as worker mules, rather than seen as providers of security and stability for the family unit.

This is no more the case. Regretfully being reliable, ‘marriage material’ in a women’s eyes means that you are a good provider, who will one day give her the resources she will need as she gets older…but for now the excitement of the bad boy alpha tingles are just to overwhelming to resist. 

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
30 Comments

30
Leave a Reply

avatar
29 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
Say It Aint SoDirk Digglercarlos jose rios grajalescheap online insurancex4cwym845tx4f8w4fw84rffw485fedw Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Justin
Guest
Justin

And this is why men should go MGTOW and marriage strike. Teach women that if they want providers they have to compromise and not reward douchebag behavior. In the long-game men hold all the cards and have all the power. This is why you PUA guys FEAR MGTOW – because you know MGTOW has the potential to change the game back to where it used to be, where, yes, even you “Alphas” had to buckle down.

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More here: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Find More Informations here: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 34164 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

Insidious Sid
Guest
Insidious Sid

This is it. This article. This is not what feminism has done. Feminism hasn’t changed women one bit – it’s simply showed us their true nature. Women will get pregnant by alpha man and get beta man to pay for her whore-spawn children. Men – get a vasectomy and never live with a woman. EVER. Any whorespawn she brings home from her trists with other men will be YOURS TO PAY for. There are two kinds of fathers now; (a) biological fathers (the alphas who fuck) and (b) SOCIAL FATHERS (the betas with the BUCK). It’s time to stand up… Read more »

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More here: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More here: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

[…] about being “strong and independent,” women never truly appreciate the value of money, and assume some chump will save them when they finally decide to settle […]

The virtuous Mgtow
Guest
The virtuous Mgtow

All this alpha male/ beta male bullshit is getting tiresome. If a quality woman says you are marriage material, and she isn’t some whore using you as the final resort, then you hit the jackpot. Who wants to be an “alpha” having one night stands for the rest of their life. That’s fucking depressing.

Say It Aint So
Guest
Say It Aint So

lmao you aren’t a mgtow

trackback

ccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb

[…]please take a look at the web pages we stick to, such as this one, because it represents our picks in the web[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 39926 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 87799 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

xcmwnv54ec8tnv5cev5jfdcnv5

[…]below you will come across the link to some sites that we assume you ought to visit[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 26175 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 79398 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

Title

[…]the time to read or visit the material or web-sites we have linked to below the[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/marriage-material-kiss-death-man/ […]

trackback

Title

[…]the time to study or pay a visit to the subject material or internet sites we have linked to below the[…]

trackback

Title

[…]The data talked about within the article are some of the very best offered […]

trackback

Title

[…]below you will come across the link to some internet sites that we believe you ought to visit[…]

trackback

Title

[…]check beneath, are some entirely unrelated internet sites to ours, nonetheless, they’re most trustworthy sources that we use[…]

trackback

Title

[…]the time to read or go to the subject material or web-sites we’ve linked to below the[…]

Dirk Diggler
Guest
Dirk Diggler

Quite possibly the best Red Pill article I have ever read on any site. Efficient, concise, straight to the heart. Well done.

Latest

Arizona Senator Jeff Flake Opposes Vote on Kavanaugh Until Leftist Accuser Has Her Say

The end of the Republic inches closer as Identity Politics knows no bounds: Republicans join the fight to delay Brett Kavanaugh confirmation vote.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

Via The Gateway Pundit


FLAKE OUT — ARIZONA SENATOR OPPOSES VOTE ON KAVANAUGH

Anti-Trump Senator Jeff Flake, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in an interview Sunday evening that until he learns more about the sexual assault allegation regarding Brett Kavanaugh, he is “not comfortable voting yes” on Kavanaugh.

It’s Flakes last chance to poke President Trump and the country in the eye before he rides retires and likely finds a job in the liberal media.

Via Mike Cernovich:

Kavanaugh’s accuser is a far left anti-Trump activist.

Via Zerohedge


Over the past few days, what appeared at first to be a merely token resistance to the nomination of Trump SCOTUS pick Brett Kavanaugh has morphed into something entirely more menacing. And for the first time since Kavanaugh’s name was first floated in June, his nomination may be in jeopardy.

After allegations of decades-old sexual improprieties first surfaced last week, it looked as if Kavanaugh would easily surmount this obstacle. But we have to give the Democrats credit: They have lined up their dominoes perfectly. And on Sunday, they set their plan in motion when the Washington Post published an in-depth interview with Kavanaugh’s accuser, Christine Blasey Ford. The story detailed a blow-by-blow accounting of Ford’s allegations, as well as her explanation for why she neglected to share her experience until decades later. Tellingly, the story also noted that Democrats have been sitting on the story since July, and that Ford only decided to out herself after some unscrupulous members of the Judiciary Committee shared her identity with the press – or at least that’s what California Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s office alleges.

While the allegations are relatively tame by #MeToo era standards (the incident allegedly unfolded when Kavanaugh was 17), it has apparently been enough for Democrats and a handful of turncoat moderate Republicans to successfully shut down a planned Thursday vote of the Judiciary Committee. Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake effectively shut down the vote last night when he revealed that he wanted to hear more from Ford before voting. Without Flake, the Republicans’ 11-10 majority on the Judiciary Committee shifts to a 10-11 vote in favor of the Democrats. While Committee Chairman Charles Grassley has said he’d like the vote to proceed as scheduled, media reports say he is quietly working to organize a private call involving Ford and curious Senators in an effort to help mitigate their concerns.

But looking further ahead, Republican leaders might have more difficulty as Tennessee Republican Bob Corker – who is not a member of the Judiciary Committee but could still hold up the final confirmation vote – said Sunday that he’d also like to see Thursday’s committee vote delayed.

Here’s more from Bloomberg:

“I’ve made it clear that I’m not comfortable moving ahead with the vote on Thursday if we have not heard her side of the story or explored this further,” said Flake, who has the power to stall consideration if all Democrats on the panel join him since Republicans only hold an 11-10 majority on the committee. Flake’s office didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Corker of Tennessee, who isn’t a member of the panel but whose vote is critical to confirmation, also doesn’t want the committee to vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation until Ford’s allegations can be heard, said his spokeswoman, Micah Johnson. The senator wants the allegations to be heard promptly, she said.

The backlash intensified late Sunday when Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski told CNN that Thursday’s hearing should be delayed.

“Well, I think that might be something they might have to consider, at least having that discussion,” Murkowski.

[…]

“This is not something that came up during the hearings. The hearings are now over. And if there is real substance to this it demands a response.”

However, at least one of the Senate’s reputed moderates has stood up to the Democrats in an interview with the New York Times, castigating them for withholding this information until so late in the process (remember: Feinstein justified this decision by saying she had referred Ford’s allegations to the FBI, who reportedly added them to his background check file).

“What is puzzling to me is the Democrats, by not bringing this out earlier, after having had this information for more than six weeks, have managed to cast a cloud of doubt on both the professor and the judge,” Collins told The New York Times.

Collins asked if Democrats believed Ford, “why didn’t they surface this information earlier,” and if they didn’t believe Ford, “why did they decide at the 11th hour to release it?”

“It is really not fair to either of them the way it is was handled,” Collins said.

Collins comments come after Ford spoke publicly about the alleged incident for the first time during an interview with The Washington Post that was published on Sunday.

On Monday, in the latest sign that Ford could appear at an embarrassing public hearing, Ford’s attorney, Debra Katz, told “Today” that her client would be willing to testify publicly before the Senate Judiciary Committee. “She’s a credible person. These are serious allegations. And they should be addressed.”

The White House, for its part, is standing by Kavanaugh, and allowing the Senate to sort things out. According to Bloomberg, Kellyanne Conway said Ford should not be “insulted and ignored” in what appears to be an attempt to beat the Democrats at their own virtue-signaling game.

Still, according to a White House spokesperson, Trump isn’t giving an inch. Washington Post reporter Seung Min Kim, citing WH spokesperson Kerri Kupec, reported that Judge Kavanaugh “categorically and unequivocally” denied this allegation: “This has not changed. Judge Kavanaugh and the White House both stand by that statement,”she said.

In fact, as Axios reports, Senate Republicans could “play hardball” by calling on Ford to testify before Thursday’s scheduled vote. Though Republicans wouldn’t surprised if Ford holds a press conference or gives a TV interview, which Axios says “would raise the stakes considerably.” Chuck Schumer, meanwhile, has repeatedly called for an FBI investigation and a postponement of the vote

To be sure, the Democrats’ goals here are obvious. After Sen. Corey Booker’s “selfless” decision to release unauthorized documents about Kavanaugh’s time in the Bush Administration failed to even delay the process, Democrats have now played their Trump card – no pun intended. Their goal: Delay Kavanaugh’s confirmation at least until the Oct. 1 mark – the beginning of SCOTUS’s next term – to put a halt to any controversial decisions that could reverse important precedents. Of course, their ultimate goal is to stonewall the White House until after Nov. 6, when a few victories in the midterms might allow them to sink Kavanaugh’s nomination once and for all.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

University announces “White Awake” safe space for white students

The University of Maryland at College Park has set up a new diversity support group to create a “safe space” for white students to discuss their feelings.

Campus Reform

Published

on

Via Campus Reform:


Update: After publication of this article, University of Maryland-College Park changed the name of the group to “Anti-Racism and Ally Building Group,” along with a shorter description, which reads,  “Do you want to improve your ability to relate to and connect with people different from yourself? Do you want to become a better ally? Members will support and share feedback with each other as they learn more about themselves and how they can fit into a diverse world.”

In a statement provided to Campus Reform on Friday, the university explained the name change: “Our Counseling Center acknowledges that we did not choose the right words in raising awareness about this research-based initiative, and how this group has been perceived is counter to the values of inclusiveness and diversity that we embody. Therefore, we are renaming the group to better reflect our intention and values.”


The University of Maryland at College Park announced Friday a new diversity support group to create a “safe space” for white students to discuss their feelings about “interactions with racial and ethnic minorities.”

The support group, called “White Awake,” will help white students who may “sometimes feel uncomfortable and confused before, during, or after interactions with racial and ethnic minorities.”

“This group offers a safe space for White students to explore their experiences, questions, reactions, and feelings,” the description explains. “Members will support and share feedback with each other as they learn more about themselves and how they can fit into a diverse world.” The description asks students if they want to “improve [their] ability to relate to and connect with people different from [themselves]” or if they want to become a better “ally.” The new group is now one of four in the university’s “Diversity Issues” program series.The group is being led by Noah Collins, who works for the UMD Counseling Center, and will be held once a week. Collins specializes in group therapy and is interested “especially in the areas of racial and cultural awareness,” according to his faculty bio.The safe space has been met with harsh criticism from students on social media.

“I am ashamed over the execution of white awake nor do I fully understand its clause. ‘How they can fit into a diverse world’? Why do they need to attend therapy sessions on how to be a decent human being in society?” a UMD student wrote on Twitter. “Why do they need to have these sessions to learn how to coexist?”

“Just like classes. You can’t take one class and feel like you have all understanding over a certain subject,” the student added. “It takes practice, it takes problems, it takes more than one course, so ‘White Awake’ has good intention but I am skeptical over the fairytale result.”

Campus Reform reached out to Collins and UMD for comment but did not receive a response by time of publication. If and when a comment is received, the article will be updated.


Follow the author of this article on Twitter: @Grace_Gotcha

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Harvard Prof: Merit-based admissions ‘reproduce inequality’

Professor Natasha Warikoo is displeased that students she interviewed are motivated by “self-interest” instead of social justice.

Campus Reform

Published

on

Authored by Toni Airaksinen of Campus Reform:


A Harvard University professor claims in a new academic study that merit-based admission processes at elite universities “reproduce inequality.”

Harvard education professor Natasha Warikoo draws on interviews with 98 white, native-born students at Harvard, Brown University, and the University of Oxford in “What Meritocracy Means to its Winners: Admissions, Race, and Inequality,” published in the journal Social Sciences.

During interviews Warikoo conducted between 2009 and 2011, these students were asked to sound-off on whether they felt their school had meritocratic admissions and if they supported affirmative action. Many answered the second question affirmatively and hailed the benefits of a diverse student body.

But Warikoo seems concerned with students’ responses. Analyzing data from these interviews years later, Warikoo points out that students’ approaches to diversity suggest that they’ve “internalized” the tokenistic rhetoric of the school admissions office, even if they had disagreed with policies like athletic recruitment or legacy admissions before coming to campus.

“Unlike in other campus domains in which there is a history of social protest among college students, in the realm of admissions, students seem to agree quite strongly with their universities, and come to even more agreement rather than critique upon arriving to campus,” she writes. “They suggest that most actors in elite institutions espouse views that reproduce their elite status, rather than engaging in symbolic politics or protest.”

According to Warikoo, “US students espouse a collective understanding of merit,” but only “value collective merit for its impact on themselves, not for social justice, or for the collective good of society.”

“They are not espousing, for example, a vision of multiculturalism that emphasizes group identities and the need to support ethnic and racial groups in society, as many scholars define multicultural state policies,” she elaborates.

Notably, Warikoo addressed the same issue in her 2016 book The Diversity Bargain, which criticizes white students for understanding “the value of diversity abstractly, but [ignoring] the real problems that racial inequality causes.”

White students “stand in fear of being labeled a racist, but they are quick to call foul should a diversity program appear at all to hamper their own chances for advancement,” Warikoo claims in that book, asserting for instance that white students “reluctantly agree with affirmative action as long as it benefits them.”

Her new study, too, criticizes white students for believing in meritocracy and supporting affirmative action, suggesting that white students only support affirmative action for selfish reasons.

One white student, Naomi, was criticized for saying “diversity is really how you learn here,” as Warikoo suggested that Naomi only valued diversity because it added to the “collective merit” of her cohort of students.

Warikoo also reports that “some students used the collective merit framework to express support for legacy admissions…even while lamenting the inequality legacy admissions engenders.”

She bemoans that, ultimately, the students she interviewed were more motivated by “self-interest” than a commitment to social justice.

“They value collective merit for its impact on themselves, not for social justice, or for the collective good of society,” she writes. “They are not espousing, for example, a vision of multiculturalism that emphasizes group identities and the need to support ethnic and racial groups.”

According to Warikoo’s interviews, students who attended elite high schools “no longer see a large number of their peers gaining admission to the likes of Harvard, Brown, and Oxford,” which they interpret “as evidence that the system is fair, even while ignoring the fact that students like them and their peers are vastly overrepresented at elite universities.”

The professor suggests that when the legitimacy of how they obtained seats at elite institutions gets called into question, students only become more convinced that they deserve to occupy those seats.

“This paper shows how admissions systems often reproduce inequality not only by how they select students, but also by defining ‘merit’ for admitted students in ways that will reproduce inequality in the future,” she concludes.

Warikoo claims that schools have “unequal” admission processes because black, working class, and first-generation students are underrepresented in student bodies. To fix this, Warikoo recommends that elite universities employ an “admissions lottery,” which the schools would use to randomly admit students who meet certain minimum standards.

“An admissions lottery would shift the meaning of selection from an absolute sense of merit—the best of the best—to an understanding that admission is somewhat arbitrary,” she predicts.

Warikoo’s study was published in the journal Social Sciences, which boasts of a “rapid peer-review” system. While most articles take months if not a year to be accepted, Warikoo’s article was accepted by reviewers in 48 days.

Though Warikoo initially agreed to answer a few questions by email, she ultimately did not respond to Campus Reform. Harvard University also did not respond.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending