Connect with us

Red Pill

News

Re-examining France’s Mistral policy…India may cancel $22 Billion Rafale fighter jet contract and instead purchase Russian Su-30 jets

India’s Defence Minister, Manohar Parrikar, has said that negotiations with Dassault over the purchase of 126 Rafale fighters have suffered ‘complications.’ Parrikar also suggested that India could opt for more licence-built Russian Su-30s instead.

Published

on

0 Views

The other shoe in Hollande’s misguided Russian Mistral cancelation may be about to drop, as India appears to be backtracking in its decision to purchase 126 Rafale jets from France’s Dassault Aviation.

After a three years effort, India’s Defence Minister, Manohar Parrikar, spoke of  an impasse in negotiations with his French counterparts. This is a serious blow to the French aviation industry which just last month announced that the deal would be completed in the first half of 2015.

Icing on the cake…The Defence Ministry announced it is now considering buying Russian Sukhoi Su-30 MKI, which according to the Defence Ministry are ‘absolutely suitable for the needs of the Indian Air Force and half the price’ of the French made Rafales.

We are also sure India feels much more comfortable purchasing from a supplier that will not fold to US/NATO pressure on a whim.

Via IHS:

India’s long-delayed procurement of 126 Dassault Rafale fighter aircraft has once again run into “complications”, defence minister Manohar Parrikar admitted on 30 December.

Parrikar did not specify these difficulties at a press conference in New Delhi, but tellingly stated that additional licence-built Sukhoi Su-30MKI multirole fighters would be “adequate” for the Indian Air Force (IAF) in the event of the Rafale deal being scrapped.

“The Su-30MKI is an adequate aircraft for meeting the air force’s needs,” Parrikar said, adding that at INR3.58 billion (USD59.66 million) each, the unit cost of the Su-30MKIs being licence-built by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) was less than half that of a Rafale.

A cancellation from India on the Rafale jets could deal a crushing blow to France’s Aerospace Industry and Dassault Aviation, which would effectively lose a blockbuster deal with the Indian Air Force.

If the Rafale deal is settled with France, then Dassault will supply 18 fighters to the Indian Air Force in flyaway condition, while the remaining 108 will be licence produced by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited.

If the deal cannot overcome its current  ‘complications’ then India’s fallback plan to purchase Russian Su-30MKI would be an absolute embarrassment to a weak President Hollande, and another bomb to France’s already slumping economy.

References:

http://www.janes.com/article/47533/indian-defence-minister-admits-complications-in-rafale-talks

http://www.defencenet.gr

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
40 Comments

40
Leave a Reply

avatar
32 Comment threads
8 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
20 Comment authors
Ellebal1111redpilltimesvictor krestGorseFiresKoosvD Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
VonHenrick1
Guest

Re-examining #France’s Mistral policy #India may cancel $22 Bln Rafale jet contract and purchase Russian Su-30 jets. http://t.co/Qpp0oDdjTZ

PeteMoraes
Guest

RT @VonHenrick1: Re-examining #France’s Mistral policy #India may cancel $22 Bln Rafale jet contract and purchase Russian Su-30 jets. http:…

JSmithRus
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Re-examining France Mistral policy. India may cancel $22B Rafale jet contract & instead buy Russian Su-30 http://t.co/Wca…

IndianPot
Guest

@redpilltimes YESSSS!

IndianPot
Guest

#sanctions #MH17 France might lose the mother of all defence deals with India. All for Ukraine.
http://t.co/PS9lHTJucK

marcelvandenber
Guest

India may cancel $22 Billion Rafale fighter jet contract and instead purchase Russian Su-30 jets http://t.co/y41ckmdSct

mennohulshof
Guest

RT @marcelvandenber: India may cancel $22 Billion Rafale fighter jet contract and instead purchase Russian Su-30 jets http://t.co/y41ckmdSct

Nildam85
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Re-examining France Mistral policy. India may cancel $22B Rafale jet contract & instead buy Russian Su-30 http://t.co/Wca…

ChrisJGodlewski
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Re-examining France Mistral policy. India may cancel $22B Rafale jet contract & instead buy Russian Su-30 http://t.co/Wca…

FresendaNormand
Guest

RT @VonHenrick1: Re-examining #France’s Mistral policy #India may cancel $22 Bln Rafale jet contract and purchase Russian Su-30 jets. http:…

KrispyVerbakel
Guest

RT @VonHenrick1: Re-examining #France’s Mistral policy #India may cancel $22 Bln Rafale jet contract and purchase Russian Su-30 jets. http:…

88marciaramalho
Guest

RT @VonHenrick1: Re-examining #France’s Mistral policy #India may cancel $22 Bln Rafale jet contract and purchase Russian Su-30 jets. http:…

shinobi22427722
Guest

RT @VonHenrick1: Re-examining #France’s Mistral policy #India may cancel $22 Bln Rafale jet contract and purchase Russian Su-30 jets. http:…

GorseFires
Guest

RT @marcelvandenber: India may cancel $22 Billion Rafale fighter jet contract and instead purchase Russian Su-30 jets http://t.co/y41ckmdSct

crnaoluja
Guest

RT @marcelvandenber: India may cancel $22 Billion Rafale fighter jet contract and instead purchase Russian Su-30 jets http://t.co/y41ckmdSct

KampferPaul
Guest

RT @marcelvandenber: India may cancel $22 Billion Rafale fighter jet contract and instead purchase Russian Su-30 jets http://t.co/y41ckmdSct

guyMadrid
Guest

Bingo @fhollande France’s Mistral policy…India may cancel Rafale contract and instead purchase Russian Su-30 jets http://t.co/4r8ZK9dnfT

Ellebal1111
Guest
Ellebal1111

India stabbing Europe in the back…just like China taking advantage of the Ukrainian situation to their advantage…undermining the world collective pressure against Putin shamefully land grab…shame!!

victor krest
Guest
victor krest

Seriously? Is that how you call it? Hey if someone i knew paid for product and didnt get it, best believe i wouldn’t take chances with my money. Specially 22 billion. Then what? Have obama say india harbors and supports terrorists and not to deliver the fighter jets. Lol. Thats like knowing the effect of stepping on the shovel and still taking high risk and stepping on it.

victor krest
Guest
victor krest

Serves Hollande right. Still owes Putin the ships or money back and major parts of ship since part of it was built in Russia with Russian parts. Then he can go cry to Obama about his issues the baby.

Ellebal1111
Guest
Ellebal1111

India stabbing Europe in the back…just like China taking advantage of the Ukrainian situation to their advantage…undermining the world collective pressure against Putin shamefully land grab…shame!!

victor krest
Guest
victor krest

Seriously? Is that how you call it? Hey if someone i knew paid for product and didnt get it, best believe i wouldn’t take chances with my money. Specially 22 billion. Then what? Have obama say india harbors and supports terrorists and not to deliver the fighter jets. Lol. Thats like knowing the effect of stepping on the shovel and still taking high risk and stepping on it.

victor krest
Guest
victor krest

Serves Hollande right. Still owes Putin the ships or money back and major parts of ship since part of it was built in Russia with Russian parts. Then he can go cry to Obama about his issues the baby.

KoosvD
Guest

@woukevscherrenb Anders lopen ze 22 miljard mis met deal India: http://t.co/gsJrHUBD0v

Ellebal1111
Guest
Ellebal1111

Are you a paid Russian troll!?? Russia has become a pariah amonst nations…just another larger North Korea…truly pathetic! And you are it’s mouth piece!

redpilltimes
Guest
redpilltimes

Why is anyone with an opinion contrary to the neo-liberal model of “morality” a Russian troll? Likewise, calling Russia a pariah state is true to western propaganda form. While the western world is trying to cement its bankrupt wall street, banker based hegemony, the international community (Latin America, Euroasia, Asia etc…) view the fact that the BRICS are rising as a counterweight to a western policy that has enslaved entire countires into debt, invaded sovereign nations like Iraq and Libya, and initiated illegal coups in Ukraine. You should re-examine who the pariahs truly are…and remember that yesterday they went after… Read more »

Ellebal1111
Guest
Ellebal1111

Are you a paid Russian troll!?? Russia has become a pariah amonst nations…just another larger North Korea…truly pathetic! And you are it’s mouth piece!

redpilltimes
Guest
redpilltimes

Why is anyone with an opinion contrary to the neo-liberal model of “morality” a Russian troll? Likewise, calling Russia a pariah state is true to western propaganda form. While the western world is trying to cement its bankrupt wall street, banker based hegemony, the international community (Latin America, Euroasia, Asia etc…) view the fact that the BRICS are rising as a counterweight to a western policy that has enslaved entire countires into debt, invaded sovereign nations like Iraq and Libya, and initiated illegal coups in Ukraine. You should re-examine who the pariahs truly are…and remember that yesterday they went after… Read more »

Ellebal1111
Guest
Ellebal1111

Keep drinking RasPutin”s Kool-Aid!! LoL! You’re an idiot! I feel sorry for the other, non brainwashed Russians….who suffered from a murderous megalomaniac such as Stalin…then Bloodimir…Russian needs a break…but then…there you are!!

redpilltimes
Guest
redpilltimes

That’s about the level of “intelligent” debate we expected.

Ellebal1111
Guest
Ellebal1111

Keep drinking RasPutin”s Kool-Aid!! LoL! You’re an idiot! I feel sorry for the other, non brainwashed Russians….who suffered from a murderous megalomaniac such as Stalin…then Bloodimir…Russian needs a break…but then…there you are!!

redpilltimes
Guest
redpilltimes

That’s about the level of “intelligent” debate we expected.

Ellebal1111
Guest
Ellebal1111

MH17…another Russian lie debunct!

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-and-europe/2015/01/10/su-25-mh17-and-the-problems-with-keeping-a-story-straight/

Ukraine’s “illegal” coup by the West debunct….another Russian gov lie….

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/01/04/world/europe/ukraine-leader-was-defeated-even-before-he-was-ousted.html?_r=3&referreru

Russia under Putin is just another North Korea!

Ellebal1111
Guest
Ellebal1111

MH17…another Russian lie debunct!

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-and-europe/2015/01/10/su-25-mh17-and-the-problems-with-keeping-a-story-straight/

Ukraine’s “illegal” coup by the West debunct….another Russian gov lie….

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/01/04/world/europe/ukraine-leader-was-defeated-even-before-he-was-ousted.html?_r=3&referreru

Russia under Putin is just another North Korea!

trackback

xcmwnv54ec8tnv5cev5jfdcnv5

[…]we came across a cool web page that you might love. Take a appear in the event you want[…]

trackback

Title

[…]Sites of interest we’ve a link to[…]

trackback

Title

[…]just beneath, are various completely not associated sites to ours, even so, they’re certainly really worth going over[…]

trackback

Title

[…]here are some hyperlinks to web sites that we link to mainly because we believe they are worth visiting[…]

trackback

Title

[…]just beneath, are a lot of entirely not associated web sites to ours, nevertheless, they are certainly worth going over[…]

trackback

Title

[…]just beneath, are various entirely not connected web pages to ours, nonetheless, they are certainly worth going over[…]

Latest

“This is America” reveals a shocking vision of the United States

The Grammy Award winning Song and Record of the Year feature the very darkest vision of what America has become.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

The Grammy Awards are the second of the three most significant musical achievement awards in the United States. Two of the anticipated awards that many fans of this event look forward to learning are the Song of the Year and the Record of the Year.

The Song of the Year is awarded to the songwriters of a given song, where the Record of the Year goes to the artists, producers and engineers involved in crafting the recording (the “record”) of a song. Both categories are huge and both usually go to an artist or organization responsible for a pop song.

It also happens to be that usually the song that is picked is beautiful and in most cases, reflects the character of beauty (whether in music or lyrics or both) for that year.

This year was quite different. Both awards went to Donald Glover, a.k.a. “Childish Gambino” for his song This is America.

This song features a radically different tone than previous winners going back for many years. Though rap remixes are usually less musical, the Grammy winners among these mixes have nevertheless retained some relatively positive, or at least attractive, aspect.

This is America is very different, especially when watched with its video.

Musically, it is genius, though the genius appears to have gone mad. Glover paints a picture of some very positive segments in American life, but then destroys it with his audible form and message that says absolutely nothing positive, but even more so – it doesn’t make sense unless one knows the context.

That context is revealed in the video with frightening images: someone getting their brains blown out (we see the blood fly), a gospel choir shot up with an automatic rifle while they were singing, and cannabis, front and center, being smoked by the artist himself.

This is America?

For Glover, this song and others on his album do seem to reflect that point of view.  Feels like Summer, one of Glover’s other recent songs, also reflects this sense of hopelessness, though it is far more musically consistent. The video gives the most clear contextual information that one could ask for, and while the video is not violent, it features degradation in society, even though the people depicted appear to be trying to make the best of their life situations.

The image Mr. Glover paints of America is a far cry from that which was known to most Americans only twenty years ago, and in fact, in many parts of the country where cannabis is still illegal there is a corresponding sense of positivity in life that is absent in Childish Gambino’s California-esque view of life.

There is a massive change that is taking place in American society. Our music and art reflects this change, and it sometimes even helps drive that change.

The United States of today is at a crossroads.

How many times have we read or heard THAT statement before?  But does it not seem so now? The attempt of identity politics to separate our nation into groups that must somehow fight for their own relevance against other groups is not the vision of the United States only twenty years ago.

Further, the normalization of themes such as drug-use and racism, the perpetuation of one in reality and the other as a mythological representation of how life “really is” in the US is radically bizarre.

In discussions with people who do not live in the United States, we found that sometimes they believed that white-on-black racism really was happening in America, because the media in the US pumps this information out in a constant stream, often with people like Donald Trump as the scapegoat.

But it is not true. Anyone in America’s new “accused class” of white, Christian, European-descent males (and some women who are not feminists), will note that they are not racist, and in fact, they feel persecuted for their existence under the new mantra of “white privilege.”

But it does not matter what they say. The media pumps the message it wants to, and with such coverage it is easy to get to halfway believing it: I know I am not this way, but I guess things are getting pretty bad elsewhere because all of those people seem to be getting this way…

This is the narrative the press promulgates, but upon conversations with people in “those places” we find that it is not true for them, either, and that they may in fact be thinking this is true about us.

Made in America is a visionary song and video. However, the vision is not a dream; it is nothing that anyone in the country would sincerely hope for. Even in Donald Glover’s case – as one of Hollywood’s hottest actors, and as a big success in music, he is far from being one of the “boys in the ‘hood.” In fact, Time Magazine in 2017 named him one of the world’s 100 most influential people.

Certainly his musical work creates a powerful influence, but it also must raise questions, with the main ones being:

  • Are we really like this?
  • Is this what we really want to be as a country?
  • Is this the kind of image we want our children in the US to adopt?

In fact, if Mr. Glover’s work was viewed with care (rather than just as something that is “cool” because the media says it is), it might help us steer away from the cliff that many Americans are in fact heading towards.

We have elected not to link to the video because it is too disturbing for children. It is even too disturbing for many adults. For that reason we are not making it one-click-easy to get to.

Parents reading this opinion piece would do well to screen the video by themselves without the kids around first, before deciding what they want to do. Even though the video is probably something that they have already seen, the parents still stand as the guides and guardians for their children through all the perils of growing up.

These times call for great guardians indeed.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Horrifying New York abortion law marks big Democrat push in US

New Mexico, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Virginia, Vermont and Washington also wish to expand abortion access to truly barbaric proportions.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

To some nations in the world, the United States may appear to be overly “conservative” or “backwards” regarding its general position on abortion. Russia, China, Canada, and Australia all allow this practice in generally unrestricted terms. Europeans are generally allowing of first trimester abortions. Social attitudes about the practice vary, with Sweden being the most permissive in terms of attitude, but Russia being the place where a woman is most likely to have had an abortion.

While the legal position in the United States on abortion is generally legal under all conditions as determined by the outcome of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision in the US Supreme Court, the social context of the practice is highly debated and generally disapproved of, even by those Americans who believe that the procedure should still be kept legal. One of the most emotionally satisfying statements in the US that actually summarized the attitudes of many “pro-choice” Americans was that of Hillary Clinton and her husband Bill Clinton’s statement that abortions should be “safe, legal and rare.”

In other words, the legality of the procedure is one thing, and the promotion of the procedure is quite another. It was summarized in this thought: We think that to be in the position of determining whether or not to abort a child is a horrifying and extremely serious matter. However, we believe it to be safer if this procedure is kept legal, lest it actually become dangerous because of inferior resources if it were banned, and done clandestinely.

This point of view was generally accepted as a secular compromise to a horrifying situation. Far from the ultraliberal attitudes of progressive Europe, the United States remained a relatively conservative country, socially guided by Christian attitudes concerning the sanctity of life, even that life which is yet unborn.

All this has changed.

Starting with the signing of New York State’s “Reproductive Health Act”, many states are now moving towards ensuring that abortion is legal under all conditions, to the full term of pregnancy, even to the point where perfectly viable, birthed babies may be killed after delivery if the mother so desires.

This report from New York was immediately followed up by this news item from Virginia’s own Legislature, in its attempt to pass a similar law, made even more clearly brutal by Governor Northam’s defense and explanation of the procedure post delivery in which a living baby would be subject to being deliberately killed at the wish of the mother. 

This law, like the New York constitutional amendment allows the unborn, or just-born (and alive even though “aborted”), no human rights.

There is really no way this action cannot be seen for what it is: infanticide, a very particularly cruel form of murder of the innocent, on no further grounds than that the baby exists and that the mother does not want it.

We covered in another news piece how this ability appears to be the prize “right” of feminist women, who were represented in Congress by the infamous Women in White, who sat stone-faced as President Donald Trump appealed for Congress to make and pass a law banning late-term abortions.

However, the President’s request was well-met by conservatives in the House chamber, and indeed, even some pro-choices were set off their guard by the New York and Virginia legislative moves. Virginia’s attempt failed.

Abortion is legal in the US, and it is legal at any point in the pregnancy in many states. This is not often reported, probably because abortion is not palatable to public discourse when a fully-formed, living baby is to be the subject of this procedure. The national discourse has for years been “safely” diverted to what appears to be more metaphysical debate about the unseen processes in pregnancy, such as “when does life really begin”, and even “when does the embryo receive a soul?”

This is probably by design to avoid the much harsher realities that were exposed in New York, Virginia and Massachusetts, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Washington and Vermont. All these states have either passed or are trying to pass laws that protect abortion rights, sometimes to similar extremes as New York’s law contains. However, many other states, such as Colorado, already allow full and late-term abortion procedures.

However, not every state in the US is trying to magnify abortion rights. Some are trying to limit this procedure, or even outlaw it entirely, should Roe v. Wade be overturned by the Supreme Court, a possibility that seems enhanced now with five “conservative” Justices on the US Supreme Court. States like Tennessee, South Carolina, Arkansas, and even the aforementioned Rhode Island are seeking passage of laws to sharply limit or completely outlaw the procedure in this event.

CDC graph showing abortion rates per 1,000 US women from 1969 to 2014. Courtesy: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Guttmacher Institute.

Interestingly, both the abortion rate and the actual number of abortions performed in the US has fallen drastically in the time period between 1980 and 2014. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention record that there were almost 1.3 million babies aborted in 1980, peaking at 1.43 million in 1990, before dropping again to 2015’s rate of 638,000. Numbers and counts vary by statistical poll, however, with 2017’s numbers showing 882,240 in this study. The common feature of declining numbers and rates is still evident.

Statistical sources on this issue were not able to explain the reason for the drop in both rate and number of abortions, but a speculation might be that some exposure to the reality of what abortion actually is has served to deter both unwanted pregnancy from even happening, and also to try to find a way to take care of human beings guilty of nothing more than their existence. Perhaps this is too generous an assessment, but it is one possibility.

President Trump was loud and clear on several occasions about his stance on the issue of abortion. His State of the Union speech featured his saying, “all children, born and unborn are made in the Holy image of God.” This was followed up by further comments at the National Prayer Breakfast, in which he continued to show a strong pro-life position.

Naturally, some pols dismiss this as nothing more than the President’s attempts to energize his base for the 2020 elections. To credit such opinions, it may indeed do this. But President Trump has really put his money where his mouth is in terms of governing as a conservative, or at least, common-sense oriented President.

The combination of Governor Andrew Cuomo’s legislation, the Virginian attempt and the March for Life, featuring its highly slurred story about Roman Catholic teenaged boys who were at the event, plus the President’s speech have made for a truly polarizing moment. To be sure, political winds in the US are so unruly now that longstanding position issues are now pushed aside in mere days, or even hours. However the mainstream media is hard-pressed to refute what happened here. The American Left tipped its hand, perhaps a little too much for even some who are ideologically liberal, and some of the harshest, most sinister aspects of their worldview were brought into focus.

This reaction extends even to both real-life and Internet commentary on such news pieces. Tucker Carlson took on uber-feminist Monica Klein on his program on January 30th, and their exchange, most notably Monica’s sheer fury, was a sign that the Left is energized on this subject, so much so that any sense of nicety has been discarded:

For Ms. Klein, this issue is a source of pure anger, as is clearly evident on her face. This was not a woman who was playing the ideological talking head for the news media hit; far from it. She really believes what she says, and has taken that fury to the point of irrationality.

Some comments on this issue appear in many publications that also reveal extremely fiery emotion on both sides. The rhetoric swings from “baby-killers” to “woman-haters” quite freely on this topic, and this is honestly a shame. Such emotional incendiary bombs are avoidances on both sides. While people call each other names, no one pays attention to the topic itself. This is, of course, by design.

When the real issue is looked at, as was shown so clearly in New York and Virginia, the topic of the value of human life shows its profound reality to everyone. If that happened often enough or long enough, it might change the substance of the conversation.

The result might then be a real change.

 

 

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Facebook: The Government’s Propaganda Arm?

The social media giant has a disturbing number of former Obama officials in key positions of authority over content.

The Duran

Published

on

Authored by Jeff Charles via Liberty Nation:


Imagine for a moment what it would look like if the federal government launched its own social media network. Every day, Americans could freely use the platform to express their views on everything from economic theory to the best tips for baking peanut butter cookies. They could even discuss their political views and debate the important issues of the day.

But what if the government were empowered to determine which political views are appropriate and which are too obscene for the American public? Well, it looks like this is already happening. Of course, the state has not created a social media network; they didn’t have to. It appears the government is using Facebook – the world’s largest social media company – to sway public opinion.

The Government’s Fingers In Facebook

The Free Thought Project recently published a report revealing that Facebook has some troubling ties to the federal government and that this connection could be enabling former state officials to influence the content displayed. The social media provider has partnered with various think tanks which receive state funding, while hiring an alarming number of individuals who have held prominent positions in the federal government.

Facebook recently announced their partnership with the Atlantic Council – which is partly funded by tax dollars – to ensure that users are presented with quality news stories. And by “quality,” it seems that they mean “progressive.” The council is well known for promoting far-left news sources, including the Xinhua News Agency, which was founded by the Communist Party of China. Well, that’s reassuring. What red-blooded American capitalist doesn’t want to get the news from a communist regime?

But there one aspect of this story is even more troubling: the government-to-Facebook pipeline. The company has employed a significant number of former officials in positions that grant them influence over what content is allowed on the platform.

Nathaniel Gleicher, Facebook’s Head of Cybersecurity Policy, prosecuted cybercrimes at the Department of Justice under President Obama. Now, he is responsible for determining who gets banned or suspended from the network. But that’s not the worst of it. He also spearheaded the company’s initiative to scrub anti-war content and “protest” movements. In a blog post, Gleicher wrote: “Some of the Pages frequently posted about topics like anti-NATO sentiment, protest movements, and anti-corruption.” He continued, “We are constantly working to detect and stop this type of activity because we don’t want our services to be used to manipulate people.”

The company has also hired others who served in key positions in the Obama administration. Some of these include:

  • Aneesh Raman: Former speechwriter
  • Joel Benenson: Top adviser
  • Meredith Carden: Office of the First Lady

To make things more interesting, Facebook has also hired neocons to help them determine the type of content that is being published. So if you happen to be a conservative that isn’t too crazy about interventionism, your views are not as welcome on the network as others. After all, how many times have you heard of people being banned for posting pro-war or socialist propaganda?

Are Private Companies Truly Private?

The notion that government officials could be using positions of power in the private industry to advance a statist agenda is disturbing, but the fact that most Americans are unaware of this is far worse. It would be inaccurate to argue that the government is controlling Facebook’s content, but the level of the state’s involvement in the world’s biggest social media company is a disturbing development.

This is not the only case of state officials becoming involved with certain industries. This trend is rampant in the certain industries in which individuals move back and forth between private organizations and the FDA. For example, Monsanto, an agricultural and agrochemical company, has been under scrutiny for its ties to the federal government.

It is not clear if there is anything that can be done to counteract inappropriate relations between the government and certain companies – especially organizations with the level of influence enjoyed by the likes of Facebook. But it essential that the public is made aware of these relations, otherwise the state will continue to exert influence over society – with Americans none the wiser.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending