Connect with us

Red Pill

News

Videos

San Francisco public transportation sports ads equating Islam to Hitler [Video]

Controversial ads splattered on the sides of Muni buses, purchased by blogger Pamela Geller’s American Freedom Defense Initiative, are again all over San Francisco. This time, the ads equate Islam with Nazism.

Published

on

47 Views

This is getting out of control.

Via SFGate…

The newest round of vitriolic banners, 50 of which went up Jan. 9, feature an image of Adolf Hitler and Haj Amin al-Husseini, a 20th Century Palestinian Muslim leader who opposed Zionism, with the words, “Islamic Jew-Hatred: It’s In The Quran.”

The ads are already attracting attention on social media.

City leaders have already been through rounds of debate over ads purchased by the far-right anti-Islamist organization — most recently in 2013. Back then, the ads were posted on 10 buses and featured photos of Osama bin Laden, a victim of the Fort Hood mass shooting and others, with incendiary quotes linking them to Islam.

One quote attributed to “Hamas MTV” read: “Killing Jews is worship that brings us closer to Allah.”

City leaders, including Mayor Ed Lee, District Attorney George Gascón and several supervisors, condemned those advertisements as racist and Islamophobic.

Even so, they are protected by freedom of speech. So in years past, Muni the sent the ad revenue to the city’s Human Rights Commission.

In 2012, the American Freedom Defense Initiative unrolled an ad campaign saying, “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad.”

Muni also gave the money from those ads to the Human Rights Commission.

“We understand and apologize that people could be offended by these ads,” Muni spokesman Paul Rose said Tuesday. “Neither the city nor Muni endorse the content of these negative ads. However, the First Amendment protects freedom of speech, including speech that is considered offensive.”

References:

http://blog.sfgate.com/stew/2015/01/13/anti-islam-ads-back-on-s-f-muni-buses-this-time-featuring-hitler/

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
30 Comments

30
Leave a Reply

avatar
26 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
mandolin pickslowest cost car insurancex30m85cgcr83n5rwxym8cnrsdfruxm3cm9wy7vf5kcwxjc3ytxk0crtsxergsdorospunun dogurdugu Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
News_World_
Guest

##SanFrancisco public transportation sports ads equating #Islam to Hitler [Video]:… http://t.co/BrztKpOobH #Politics http://t.co/kQDH09Efq6

Mary Wilbur
Guest
Mary Wilbur

I love that those anti-Islamic anti-Semitism ads are appearing at ground zero of Progressivism. They are the fascists.

redpilltimes
Guest
redpilltimes

Excellent point. Coming from “ground zero of Progressivism” one would expect more tolerance and logic. When does free speech give way to full hate?

Regardless of the argument where people in SF will say that the ads are part of the right to free speech, you cannot close your eyes to the fact that these ridiculous ads are extremely hateful, absolutely inaccurate (from a fact base, historical perspective) and will, without a doubt influence people’s feelings about islam.

They should have not been allowed to be placed on public transport.

Mary Wilbur
Guest
Mary Wilbur

Frankly I’m in favor of what some people call “radical” free speech; however, I think an argument can be made for abolishing the use of public transportation as a billboard for advertising of any kind. Call it “beautification.” I think it was back during the Johnson administration that Lady Bird Johnson started and ran with a “beautify” America program. Part of that effort resulted in abolishing all advertising billboards on the country’s highways. Maybe SF’s public transportation should be “beautified.”

Mary Wilbur
Guest
Mary Wilbur

I love that those anti-Islamic anti-Semitism ads are appearing at ground zero of Progressivism. They are the fascists.

redpilltimes
Guest
redpilltimes

Excellent point. Coming from “ground zero of Progressivism” one would expect more tolerance and logic. When does free speech give way to full hate?

Regardless of the argument where people in SF will say that the ads are part of the right to free speech, you cannot close your eyes to the fact that these ridiculous ads are extremely hateful, absolutely inaccurate (from a fact base, historical perspective) and will, without a doubt influence people’s feelings about islam.

They should have not been allowed to be placed on public transport.

Mary Wilbur
Guest
Mary Wilbur

Frankly I’m in favor of what some people call “radical” free speech; however, I think an argument can be made for abolishing the use of public transportation as a billboard for advertising of any kind. Call it “beautification.” I think it was back during the Johnson administration that Lady Bird Johnson started and ran with a “beautify” America program. Part of that effort resulted in abolishing all advertising billboards on the country’s highways. Maybe SF’s public transportation should be “beautified.”

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More Infos here: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 83393 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Find More Informations here: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 42245 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] There you will find 25932 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More Infos here: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

ccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb

[…]usually posts some very exciting stuff like this. If you are new to this site[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More here: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

xcmwnv54ec8tnv5cev5jfdcnv5

[…]The information talked about within the report are some of the most beneficial out there […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

Title

[…]Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a number of unrelated information, nonetheless really worth taking a search, whoa did one master about Mid East has got a lot more problerms at the same time […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/san-francisco-public-transportation-sports-ads-equating-islam-hitler-video/ […]

trackback

Title

[…]we like to honor lots of other world-wide-web sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Beneath are some webpages really worth checking out[…]

trackback

Title

[…]always a large fan of linking to bloggers that I appreciate but really don’t get quite a bit of link really like from[…]

trackback

Title

[…]Here are several of the web sites we advise for our visitors[…]

trackback

Title

[…]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[…]

Latest

A dispassionate case for the American border wall

All the arguing on both sides is a rhetorical war that prevents action from happening. Here are simple reasons the border wall should go up.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

One of the hottest news stories in the American press has been that over the border wall, proposed by President Trump during his campaign, and now resting at the center of a debate that has about one-quarter of the US governmental services in a state of shutdown. We have observed fiery, passionate, and even disgusting levels of rancor and bitterness in the political rhetoric concerning the wall. This debate goes on in the news media, and many of the Americans who watch and listen to this take on the fire of these arguments to even more passionate levels.

However, the passion has largely obscured the actual issue of border security, perhaps by design. As long as people keep fighting over it, it still is not getting done. And while thankfully the American government is designed to work very slowly in determining important matters, here, that trait is being exploited, mostly by Democrats, but also by Republicans and even possibly, President Trump himself.

The motives each side has vary.

President Trump wants Congress to pass wall funding because then it is a legislative act that the Legislative and Executive branches of government agree on. It is unlikely that the Supreme Court will be called upon to test such a resolution for its legality. This is one very significant reason why the President is trying every way possible to get this through Congress.

If he goes the route of declaring a “National Emergency” then, according to a number of sources, the first thing that is likely to happen after the build order is a lawsuit that stops the process in its tracks – probably a land-use lawsuit regarding eminent domain and damage to the properties of private citizens, who for various reasons do not want a barrier built through their lands. This is a problem that the American government has sadly created for itself with a very poor reputation of proper reparations for the invocation of Eminent Domain land claims.

This is the simplest way to explain the raison d’être behind the President’s hesitation to invoke executive emergency powers.

For the Democrats, the motive is interesting. The rhetoric from conservatives, including the President, is that the Dems do not want the wall simply because the “imposter” President wants one. 

For anyone who thinks that this is an utterly insane, and indeed, childish, argument, well, you would be exactly right. It is.

It also appears to be true. Evidence for this is shown by the fact that almost every critic quoted by the mainstream press is a Democrat. How is it possible that Democrats have a unique hold on facts that other people just don’t? Even when a Republican expresses a concern about the wall, there is still actual logistical information backing the claim:

Republican and Democratic lawmakers raised immediate concerns over shifting funds that have already been approved by Congress for projects in states across the nation.

Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho, a top Republican on the Appropriations Committee, said he has been hearing from lawmakers in recent days concerned that Army Corps projects in their states could be canceled or postponed.

(This is a concrete situation that is based on normal concerns about money and not about ideological political views.)

“If they drag the money out of here,” Simpson said in an interview late Thursday, “a lot of members will have problem with it.”

(But now in come the Democrats, and observe as logic leaves and is replaced by fiery language.)

Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., the incoming chairman of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said in an interview that rebuilding the disaster areas is “a way higher priority benefiting the American people than a wasteful wall.”

He said the Army Corps works on dams, levees and other projects across the nation and has an enormous backlog of unfunded needs. “It would be an incredible disservice to the American people and the economy” to divert the money to the border wall, he said.

And Rep. Nydia Velazquez, D-N.Y., said in a statement that it would be “beyond appalling for the president to take money from places like Puerto Rico that have suffered enormous catastrophes, costing thousands of American citizens’ lives, in order to pay for Donald Trump’s foolish, offensive and hateful wall.

“Siphoning funding from real disasters to pay for a crisis manufactured by the president is wholly unacceptable and the American people won’t fall for it,” she said.

The Republican here spoke without passion, simply saying there is concern about shifting funds for the wall. But the Democrats used incendiary language like “wasteful” and “foolish, offensive and hateful” as adjectives to describe the border wall. Very passionate expressions, which are being repeated ad nauseam by the mainstream press and all of the Democrat party.

The bias most notably and publicly showed in the accusatory language of the Democrat kingpins themselves, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi.

There is little true “debate” about the border wall. Most discussion on the news media or social media is verbal rock-throwing rather than respectful, honest and fair discussion. As noted before, this may be part of the design to prevent action on the wall.

However there are dispassionate and reasonable arguments that support the construction of this project. Here are some of those reasons:

  •  A 30-35 foot tall wall running the entire length of the border is probably the cheapest and most cost effective single deterrent to illegal border crossings. Whoever wants to cross the border has to make some provision for dealing with the wall. If that provision is rather difficult, it will dissuade most people from trying it.
  • A wall reduces the need for manpower along the border. While it is absurd to assume that the wall alone would keep every illegal immigrant out, it also facilitates efficient deployment of manpower and other means for active border control.
  • Even if the wall is not continuous along the entire length of the border (which is likely to wind up as the case), where it isn’t is easier to monitor. This is another aspect of the manpower issue. There are likely to be gaps and open spaces for a variety of reasons. But right now, there are about over 1,200 miles of the 1,954 mile long border that have no barrier present. That is a lot of space to monitor actively.

These three reasons are really so close as to be almost the same exact reason. But the arguments for and against the border wall are being conducted in an apparent context that in order to secure a border, this is all anyone needs to do. This is an absurd idea and is being used to try to deflect action.

  • The best border security systems in the world are systems of walls, fences and monitoring facilities. Even the Great Wall of China did not stop all invaders. It deterred a lot of probable attempts though. The wall was also manned so that active attempts to get through it could be stopped in active manners.
  • The North – South Korean DMZ and the Berlin Wall are also particularly effective as parts of an overall border crossing deterrent system. The fences, trenches and watchtowers along the length of these two borders create an extremely effective measure to deter illegal crossings. For example, the Berlin Wall stood from 1961 to 1989, a total of 28 years. During that period, only five thousand people crossed that border. The US Border Patrol conducted over 300,000 apprehensions of illegal immigrants crossing the border in 2018 alone.

The imagery of walls like North Korea’s and East Berlin’s are part of the reason why the border wall comes across as an unsavory idea. There is probably no American that does not know this image, and no one in the country like the idea of such a barrier being associated with the United States.

However, that is simply not the issue. The US is not a police state trying to keep people inside. It is dealing with a decades-long stretch of bad policy regarding immigration which will not be stopped except by radical means.

Many families made a very long journey this year in the migrant caravans to try to game the American system. It is understandable that many of these people are trying to get away from bad conditions in the countries they left. But taking advantage of the United States is wrong, and the wrong is shared equally by the actions of the illegals and by the weak posture of the United States herself.

The simplest fact is that only strength assures freedom. A strong border reinforces safe immigration. A strong and effective immigration policy relies on having a tightly controlled border AND an asylum and entry facilitation process that is thorough, lawful and dispassionate. The USA has had this in place in other points of entry, such as Ellis Island. Leaving the Mexican frontier open now is just stupid policy. An integrated, careful process to process would be immigrants as quickly and carefully as possible needs to become part of the new American way of doing things. There is no swifter way to guarantee overall immigration policy change than the construction of the physical barrier along the US-Mexican border.

It does not matter how anyone feels or thinks. Walls work when used rightly. President Trump’s plan satisfies all the required needs for a good US immigration policy as regards the Mexican border.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

US Women’s March implodes upon itself [Video]

This year’s Women’s March collapses due to not being politically woke enough, in a truly astounding fashion.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

If this doesn’t make your head spin, perhaps you are either dead, or sufficiently “woke.” The Humboldt County Annual Women’s March, set for January 19th of this year got canceled because it was “too white.”

Yes. Too white. This is a county in Northern California, 270 miles north of San Francisco. According to the Wikipedia entry, on this locale, the 2016 census gave this demographic result.

In other words, the county’s own demographics are very white.

So, does this make sense? No? Well, maybe the interview will clear it up.

Still no?

It seems that Jesse Watters was just as stunned as anyone else. The expression on his face is priceless. Should I laugh now, or later? How does this woman actually believe her own rhetoric?

But the woman, Kelsey Reedy, seems to have the logic worked out in her mind.

Maybe that is because she is a woman. A liberal woman. Fantasy turned inside out. But wait! She also even included expletive language on a televised interview, which is indecent in of itself.

It would appear that being “woke” can truly turn in on itself.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

“The Criminals Who Run The Deep State Will Be Exposed”: Kim Dotcom Teases “Next Round Of Leaks”

Kim Dotcom: “Get ready for the next round of leaks.”

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


Hacker and serial entrepreneur Kim Dotcom is out with a new prediction for 2019:

“Get ready for the next round of leaks.”

Dotcom then tweeted “This year the criminals who run the Deep State will be exposed,” adding “The shareholders profiting from war and chaos. The billionaires who turn democracy into an illusion. They own politicians, judges and all your data. They are the biggest pirates in history. Want to know who they are?”

For those paying attention, Dotcom dropped massive breadcrumbs going all the way back to 2015 regarding the WikiLeaks release of Hillary Clinton’s emails during the 2016 US election.

And while he’s has made headlines for years, in February Dotcom boldly stated that the DNC “hack” which kicked off the Russian election interference narrative was bogus, tweeting: “Let me assure you, the DNC hack wasn’t even a hack. It was an insider with a memory stick. I know this because I know who did it and why.”

Dotcom says he offered to produce evidence to Special Counsel Robert Mueller, twice, and they never even replied to him.

Apparently Mueller is only interested in the chosen narrative, regardless of whether or not the glove fits.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending