Turns out Ashley Madison was one big sausage fest. Database reveals a site full of men with few women (if any) using the service

Bottom line, married women do not need to go to a web site to have an affair. Women get hit on 1,000 times a day…married, single, engaged, it doesn’t matter.

Beta males have a hard time coming to grips with this simple yet universally truth…women can gat action at any time, of any day, at any hour.

The rub comes in the built in, biological constraint women face with their very own hypergamy, which drives them to want that affair, not with any poor schlep, but a man who is better and superior to the one they already got.

The Ashley Madison hacking only proves the above point. Beta men are desperate creatures, looking for some kind of magic pill to combat their wives sexual and emotional leverage over them. There is no magic pill, only the red pill.

Diving into the AM database shows what a pathetic sausage festival the site really was. Men wasting their time on AM trying to “get lucky” would have been 100 times better off spending that time in the gym.

Via Gizomodo…

When hacker group Impact Team released the Ashley Madison data, they asserted that “thousands” of the women’s profiles were fake. Later, this number got blown up in news stories that asserted “90-95%” of them were fake, though nobody put forth any evidence for such an enormous number. So I downloaded the data and analyzed it to find out how many actual women were using Ashley Madison, and who they were.

What I discovered was that the world of Ashley Madison was a far more dystopian place than anyone had realized. This isn’t a debauched wonderland of men cheating on their wives. It isn’t even a sadscape of 31 million men competing to attract those 5.5 million women in the database. Instead, it’s like a science fictional future where every woman on Earth is dead, and some Dilbert-like engineer has replaced them with badly-designed robots.

Those millions of Ashley Madison men were paying to hook up with women who appeared to have created profiles and then simply disappeared. Were they cobbled together by bots and bored admins, or just user debris? Whatever the answer, the more I examined those 5.5 million female profiles, the more obvious it became that none of them had ever talked to men on the site, or even used the site at all after creating a profile. Actually, scratch that. As I’ll explain below, there’s a good chance that about 12,000 of the profiles out of millions belonged to actual, real women who were active users of Ashley Madison.

When you look at the evidence, it’s hard to deny that the overwhelming majority of men using Ashley Madison weren’t having affairs. They were paying for a fantasy.

Nobody disputed the dramatic gender disparity in the Ashley Madison user base, including the company itself. 5.5 million profiles are marked “female” in a database of roughly 37 million people.

It’s also a matter of public record that some percentage of the profiles are less than real. A few years ago, a former employee of Ashley Madison sued the company in Canada over her terrible work conditions. She claimed that she’d gotten repetitive stress injuries in her hands after the company hired her to create 1,000 fake profiles of women in three months, written in Portuguese, to attract a Brazilian audience. The case was settled out of court, and Ashley Madison claimed that the woman never made any fake profiles.

Still, there is a clause in the Ashley Madison terms of service that notes that “some” people are using the site purely “for entertainment” and that they are “not seeking in person meetings with anyone they meet on the Service, but consider their communications with users and Members to be for their amusement.” The site stops short of saying these are fake people, but does admit that many profiles are for “amusement only.”

Based on this evidence, we’ve got some clear indications that many of the profiles are fake.

References:

http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-women-in-the-ashley-madison-database-1725558944