Connect with us

Red Pill


When Ukraine breaks the Minsk 2 agreement, these are the headlines that western main stream media will blast out

Because we all know the US/EU backed Ukraine government and army will never be able to adhere to the Minsk 2 agreements, and when they don’t Russia will be blamed…we wanted to get ahead of the western propaganda machine. Here are the headlines ready for mass consumption.




Let’s just get ahead of the curve here and help out Western main stream media, because while we hope Ukrainian citizens will take pause and begin the denazification process of their government, America has other plans…mainly the ‘Yugoslavation’ of Ukraine and Russia.

Given America’s addiction to war, conflict and chaos, the order will be directed to Ambassador Geoffrey R. Pyatt (the Governor of Ukraine) to tell his ‘on the ground’ nazi minions to not agree to anything written in the Minsk 2 agreement.

With that order, the US/EU backed Ukraine armed forces will continue their reign of terror in the East. Freedom of speech and press will continue to fall under the heavy hand of Ukraine’s Ministry of Truth, and the cat and mouse game of conscription will continue…as men not, willing to be put into America’s meat grinder of war, will try to flee to Russia seeking a safe haven from the chaos.

The minute Ukraine begins to drag its feet, and inevitably break every single requirement outlined in the Minsk 2 agreement, western main steam media, the State Department and every journalist under the Empire’s thumb will be ready to fire a barrage of propaganda and lies about who is to blame. *Hint, Russia and Putin of course.

So let’s get ahead of the western propaganda machine…

Here you go New York Times, Economist, Guardian, US President Obama, John Kerry, John McCain, Victoria Nuland, Jen Psaki, Angela Merkel, Donald Tusk, Anne Applebaum, Thomas Friedman and all the other western nut jobs driving for war with Russia. Hot off the press, and a few weeks in advance. Feel free to use any of the below headlines in your future news posts:

  • The obvious headline: Russia breaks Minsk 2 agreement.
  • The Iraq play: WMDs spotted in Russia.
  • Breaking news: Russia has just invaded Ukraine.
  • Social media headline: Facebook post says 19,000 Russian troops crossed border. Evidence…Facebook DUH!
  • The Putin invasion headline: Putin is using the Minsk agreement as a pretext to invade Latvia, Lithuania and Sweden. How? We are not sure, but trust us he is.
  • The WW2 History lesson: Prime Minister Yats claims on German TV that Russia actually bombed Pearl Harbor.
  • The Russian military headline: 300 Russian tanks were spotted in a military base near Vladivostok. An invasion of Ukraine is immanent.
  • The Merkel headline: Angela Merkel speaks on the phone with Vladimir Putin. The German Chancellor claims that Putin told her Ivan Drago was paid to take a fall against Rocky Balboa. “Putin is out of touch with reality” claims Merkel.
  • The Novorussian bombing headline: The Novorussian army has begun shelling Donetsk and Lugansk. Why are they shelling their own cities you ask? We are not sure, but trust us someone tweeted it.
  • The Ukraine army is winning headline: The Glorious Ukraine army has captured Debeltseve, Gorlovka, Saint Petersburg, and Lviv.
  • The Poroshenko speech headline: Ukraine’s President Poroshenko, in a speech before the US Congress, holds up a a pair of unwashed boxer shorts that he claims belong to a Russian soldier, who is now in Ukraine, fighting Glorious Ukraine army with his junk out and about.
  • The Russian planes flying over Europe headline: Russian Aeroflot planes were spotted flying over Heathrow airport and even landed on the runway. British jets scrambled immediately to intercept the planes.
  • The Hunt for Red October headline: Swedish authorities are reporting a strange object floating off their coast. Press reports a Russian submarine, turns out to actually be a piece of drift wood.
  • The ‘we need money’ headline: Ukraine government needs an additional $100 billion to continue its glorious path towards democracy. George Soros suggests EU should give Ukraine this money and simply add it to Greece’s bail out tab.
  • The NATO headline: Small earthquake hits western Russia which physically shifts Russian land an inch closer west. NATO says this is hard evidence that Russia is moving closer to NATO.
  • The Nuland headline: Another phone conversation between Victoria Nuland and Ambassador Pyatt is leaked on Youtube. Nuland caught saying “Suck on this…EU” while grabbing a hold of her crotch.
  • The John McCain headline: John McCain tells Fox News that America should provide lethal military weapons to Ukrainian citizens currently living in Canada.
  • The Yats headline: Yats gets a new pair of eye glasses…spots 3,316.19 Russian troops invading Ukraine. US/EU impose more sanctions against Russia.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

Leave a Reply

11 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
cm59x4ctxckw54mtdfsgw9j5nwmtxm845wctfkdijtfdhskdsftrg83yrerxt5m8ct4ykwk7rdywx8t54w5ctxsdf3nvb54wnxd5cbvbecnv5ev75bcccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

#When Ukraine breaks the Minsk 2 agreement, these are the headlines… #timeline #notizie #news


What will western media headlines say when the #Minsk ceasefire is broken by #Ukraine


RT @redpilltimes: What will western media headlines say when the #Minsk ceasefire is broken by #Ukraine



Funny, but at the same dead serious, because we SAW already much of such #MSM graziness.

#Ukraine #West #Propaganda

Bishop of Bath and Wells
Bishop of Bath and Wells

Yeah, we know how untrustworthy the EU/US backing is since they invaded Crimea and when they were asked about the invasion they even denied their troops being there. Oh, wait…

Rocky Racoon
Rocky Racoon

I think a lot of people in Europe are aware of what is going on they could very well hit the streets in their own countries and demand an end to sanctions and war get out of NATO and the EU and or join in an economic alliance with Russia……That is possible as well. We the people are pretty pioffed with our political and economic elites. Germany and France say no to weapons UK stirs the pot and the whole Euro deal crashes and burns. They are already half way down the tubes already. And Greece speaks truth to power……



[…]one of our guests lately encouraged the following website[…]



[…]the time to read or take a look at the content material or web sites we’ve linked to below the[…]



[…]although sites we backlink to below are considerably not associated to ours, we feel they are essentially really worth a go by way of, so possess a look[…]



[…]very few web sites that happen to be in depth below, from our point of view are undoubtedly properly worth checking out[…]



[…]Every as soon as in a even though we pick blogs that we study. Listed below would be the most up-to-date web pages that we pick out […]


A dispassionate case for the American border wall

All the arguing on both sides is a rhetorical war that prevents action from happening. Here are simple reasons the border wall should go up.

Seraphim Hanisch



One of the hottest news stories in the American press has been that over the border wall, proposed by President Trump during his campaign, and now resting at the center of a debate that has about one-quarter of the US governmental services in a state of shutdown. We have observed fiery, passionate, and even disgusting levels of rancor and bitterness in the political rhetoric concerning the wall. This debate goes on in the news media, and many of the Americans who watch and listen to this take on the fire of these arguments to even more passionate levels.

However, the passion has largely obscured the actual issue of border security, perhaps by design. As long as people keep fighting over it, it still is not getting done. And while thankfully the American government is designed to work very slowly in determining important matters, here, that trait is being exploited, mostly by Democrats, but also by Republicans and even possibly, President Trump himself.

The motives each side has vary.

President Trump wants Congress to pass wall funding because then it is a legislative act that the Legislative and Executive branches of government agree on. It is unlikely that the Supreme Court will be called upon to test such a resolution for its legality. This is one very significant reason why the President is trying every way possible to get this through Congress.

If he goes the route of declaring a “National Emergency” then, according to a number of sources, the first thing that is likely to happen after the build order is a lawsuit that stops the process in its tracks – probably a land-use lawsuit regarding eminent domain and damage to the properties of private citizens, who for various reasons do not want a barrier built through their lands. This is a problem that the American government has sadly created for itself with a very poor reputation of proper reparations for the invocation of Eminent Domain land claims.

This is the simplest way to explain the raison d’être behind the President’s hesitation to invoke executive emergency powers.

For the Democrats, the motive is interesting. The rhetoric from conservatives, including the President, is that the Dems do not want the wall simply because the “imposter” President wants one. 

For anyone who thinks that this is an utterly insane, and indeed, childish, argument, well, you would be exactly right. It is.

It also appears to be true. Evidence for this is shown by the fact that almost every critic quoted by the mainstream press is a Democrat. How is it possible that Democrats have a unique hold on facts that other people just don’t? Even when a Republican expresses a concern about the wall, there is still actual logistical information backing the claim:

Republican and Democratic lawmakers raised immediate concerns over shifting funds that have already been approved by Congress for projects in states across the nation.

Rep. Mike Simpson of Idaho, a top Republican on the Appropriations Committee, said he has been hearing from lawmakers in recent days concerned that Army Corps projects in their states could be canceled or postponed.

(This is a concrete situation that is based on normal concerns about money and not about ideological political views.)

“If they drag the money out of here,” Simpson said in an interview late Thursday, “a lot of members will have problem with it.”

(But now in come the Democrats, and observe as logic leaves and is replaced by fiery language.)

Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., the incoming chairman of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said in an interview that rebuilding the disaster areas is “a way higher priority benefiting the American people than a wasteful wall.”

He said the Army Corps works on dams, levees and other projects across the nation and has an enormous backlog of unfunded needs. “It would be an incredible disservice to the American people and the economy” to divert the money to the border wall, he said.

And Rep. Nydia Velazquez, D-N.Y., said in a statement that it would be “beyond appalling for the president to take money from places like Puerto Rico that have suffered enormous catastrophes, costing thousands of American citizens’ lives, in order to pay for Donald Trump’s foolish, offensive and hateful wall.

“Siphoning funding from real disasters to pay for a crisis manufactured by the president is wholly unacceptable and the American people won’t fall for it,” she said.

The Republican here spoke without passion, simply saying there is concern about shifting funds for the wall. But the Democrats used incendiary language like “wasteful” and “foolish, offensive and hateful” as adjectives to describe the border wall. Very passionate expressions, which are being repeated ad nauseam by the mainstream press and all of the Democrat party.

The bias most notably and publicly showed in the accusatory language of the Democrat kingpins themselves, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi.

There is little true “debate” about the border wall. Most discussion on the news media or social media is verbal rock-throwing rather than respectful, honest and fair discussion. As noted before, this may be part of the design to prevent action on the wall.

However there are dispassionate and reasonable arguments that support the construction of this project. Here are some of those reasons:

  •  A 30-35 foot tall wall running the entire length of the border is probably the cheapest and most cost effective single deterrent to illegal border crossings. Whoever wants to cross the border has to make some provision for dealing with the wall. If that provision is rather difficult, it will dissuade most people from trying it.
  • A wall reduces the need for manpower along the border. While it is absurd to assume that the wall alone would keep every illegal immigrant out, it also facilitates efficient deployment of manpower and other means for active border control.
  • Even if the wall is not continuous along the entire length of the border (which is likely to wind up as the case), where it isn’t is easier to monitor. This is another aspect of the manpower issue. There are likely to be gaps and open spaces for a variety of reasons. But right now, there are about over 1,200 miles of the 1,954 mile long border that have no barrier present. That is a lot of space to monitor actively.

These three reasons are really so close as to be almost the same exact reason. But the arguments for and against the border wall are being conducted in an apparent context that in order to secure a border, this is all anyone needs to do. This is an absurd idea and is being used to try to deflect action.

  • The best border security systems in the world are systems of walls, fences and monitoring facilities. Even the Great Wall of China did not stop all invaders. It deterred a lot of probable attempts though. The wall was also manned so that active attempts to get through it could be stopped in active manners.
  • The North – South Korean DMZ and the Berlin Wall are also particularly effective as parts of an overall border crossing deterrent system. The fences, trenches and watchtowers along the length of these two borders create an extremely effective measure to deter illegal crossings. For example, the Berlin Wall stood from 1961 to 1989, a total of 28 years. During that period, only five thousand people crossed that border. The US Border Patrol conducted over 300,000 apprehensions of illegal immigrants crossing the border in 2018 alone.

The imagery of walls like North Korea’s and East Berlin’s are part of the reason why the border wall comes across as an unsavory idea. There is probably no American that does not know this image, and no one in the country like the idea of such a barrier being associated with the United States.

However, that is simply not the issue. The US is not a police state trying to keep people inside. It is dealing with a decades-long stretch of bad policy regarding immigration which will not be stopped except by radical means.

Many families made a very long journey this year in the migrant caravans to try to game the American system. It is understandable that many of these people are trying to get away from bad conditions in the countries they left. But taking advantage of the United States is wrong, and the wrong is shared equally by the actions of the illegals and by the weak posture of the United States herself.

The simplest fact is that only strength assures freedom. A strong border reinforces safe immigration. A strong and effective immigration policy relies on having a tightly controlled border AND an asylum and entry facilitation process that is thorough, lawful and dispassionate. The USA has had this in place in other points of entry, such as Ellis Island. Leaving the Mexican frontier open now is just stupid policy. An integrated, careful process to process would be immigrants as quickly and carefully as possible needs to become part of the new American way of doing things. There is no swifter way to guarantee overall immigration policy change than the construction of the physical barrier along the US-Mexican border.

It does not matter how anyone feels or thinks. Walls work when used rightly. President Trump’s plan satisfies all the required needs for a good US immigration policy as regards the Mexican border.


Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading


US Women’s March implodes upon itself [Video]

This year’s Women’s March collapses due to not being politically woke enough, in a truly astounding fashion.

Seraphim Hanisch



If this doesn’t make your head spin, perhaps you are either dead, or sufficiently “woke.” The Humboldt County Annual Women’s March, set for January 19th of this year got canceled because it was “too white.”

Yes. Too white. This is a county in Northern California, 270 miles north of San Francisco. According to the Wikipedia entry, on this locale, the 2016 census gave this demographic result.

In other words, the county’s own demographics are very white.

So, does this make sense? No? Well, maybe the interview will clear it up.

Still no?

It seems that Jesse Watters was just as stunned as anyone else. The expression on his face is priceless. Should I laugh now, or later? How does this woman actually believe her own rhetoric?

But the woman, Kelsey Reedy, seems to have the logic worked out in her mind.

Maybe that is because she is a woman. A liberal woman. Fantasy turned inside out. But wait! She also even included expletive language on a televised interview, which is indecent in of itself.

It would appear that being “woke” can truly turn in on itself.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading


“The Criminals Who Run The Deep State Will Be Exposed”: Kim Dotcom Teases “Next Round Of Leaks”

Kim Dotcom: “Get ready for the next round of leaks.”



Via Zerohedge

Hacker and serial entrepreneur Kim Dotcom is out with a new prediction for 2019:

“Get ready for the next round of leaks.”

Dotcom then tweeted “This year the criminals who run the Deep State will be exposed,” adding “The shareholders profiting from war and chaos. The billionaires who turn democracy into an illusion. They own politicians, judges and all your data. They are the biggest pirates in history. Want to know who they are?”

For those paying attention, Dotcom dropped massive breadcrumbs going all the way back to 2015 regarding the WikiLeaks release of Hillary Clinton’s emails during the 2016 US election.

And while he’s has made headlines for years, in February Dotcom boldly stated that the DNC “hack” which kicked off the Russian election interference narrative was bogus, tweeting: “Let me assure you, the DNC hack wasn’t even a hack. It was an insider with a memory stick. I know this because I know who did it and why.”

Dotcom says he offered to produce evidence to Special Counsel Robert Mueller, twice, and they never even replied to him.

Apparently Mueller is only interested in the chosen narrative, regardless of whether or not the glove fits.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading


Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...


Quick Donate

The Duran
Donate a quick 10 spot!


The Duran Newsletter