Connect with us

Red Pill

News

UNESCO wants to propagate transgenderism to Children

Published

on

14 Views

UNESCO is the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization; most of us know them based on their UNESCO World Heritage Site designation, a special status given to places and structures of immense cultural value. Based on the name, you would think they would focus mainly on education, science, and culture…but this is the 21st century we are talking about, in a heavily Western influenced organization, so naturally, there is a large amount of indoctrination, pseudo-science, and cultural degeneracy that goes along with it.

The United Nations is no more than the sum of its parts, and it certainly wasn’t built primarily by Eastern and Southern Europeans, Middle Easterners, East Asians, etc, but rather, the majority of the founding and leading members were Western, and inheritors of the secular humanist/rationalist ideas of the enlightenment.

While the UN does provide a platform for independently thinking countries like Russia and China to speak, and contrary to the beliefs of some more extreme conspiracies, it can not be viewed in its entirety as a sinister organization. If the UN promotes something immortal, this is the agenda of its specific members – let’s not pretend it has a stronger voice than it actually does, it’s basically an international forum everyone is obligated to respect.

As a result of its Western-leaning philosophy on social issues, embracing the secular view of human evolution, nature, and ontology, it is no surprise that UNESCO would promote transgenderism and non-traditional sexuality, and it’s increasingly disturbing how they intend to normalize this among minors. The Conservative Women reports:

UNESCO has updated its Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE) policy to include transgenderism. Task forces have already been established to encourage governments to legislate for CSE lessons in schools in a process called ‘scaling up’. This benign phrase hides the sinister intent behind this agenda. The more positive aspects of CSE, such as critiques of FGM and discrimination against girls in developing countries, are debased by teaching children as young as five about transgenderism.

The CSE document consists of detailed lesson plans with headings such as ‘Promote Transgender Ideology and Respect for Diverse Gender Identities’. Respect for sexual equality is undermined by the obsessive championing of transgenderism – activists are pushing women and girls out of female spaces such as bathrooms, swimming pools and politics.

Not only is the transgender movement anti-science in its deliberate misunderstanding of the differences between men and women, it also advocates for the precocious sexualisation of children. It is difficult to explain transgenderism without describing sex, sexuality and gender – concepts that pre-pubescent children do not need to confront. But contributors to CSE give it their best shot.

CSE instructs children, who have only just learnt to tie their own shoelaces, that they must reflect on their own gender, ‘body rights’ and genitals. Children as young as five are being told to ‘describe ways that human beings feel pleasure from physical contact (e.g. kissing, touching, caressing, sexual contact) throughout their life (knowledge)’. Children as young as nine are being taught about rape, pornography and that their gender identity might not match their biological sex.

Twelve-year-olds are commanded to question gender and sex roles in relationships. And 15- to 18-year-olds are being warned against ‘transphobia’ and are encouraged to rebel against their parents if they object to transgenderism. UNESCO is clearly regurgitating the socialist ideal where parents are obsolete and the state becomes mother and father.

Children’s innocence is being destroyed in favour of an agenda which destroys the Judeo-Christian ethos of traditional families, confuses children to the point of hysteria and encourages teenagers to mutilate their bodies.

UNESCO attempts to explain its perverse policy with empty platitudes about changing cultural norms and warnings about human rights. But it is our free speech rights and innocent childhoods that are in peril here.

This is encapsulated by the recent fuss made by Susie Green, CEO of the transgender charity Mermaids. Green took her 16-year-old son to Thailand for what one mother on Twitter, Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull, referred to as ‘castration.’ This prompted Green to complain to the police. Keen-Minshull was subsequently questioned by the police who told her that she could be prosecuted as a test case for the crime of ‘transphobia’. This is another attack on free speech.

We all should be concerned about the implications for us. Mermaids is already in partnership with the Department of Education to teach trans propaganda to our children. It is realistic to expect that CSE will also become a regular addition to school syllabi.

We are being held hostage to the indoctrination of young children into what is technically a self-obsessed sexual cult. And if we protest against this form of minority identity politics we risk being imprisoned for the Orwellian concept of hate crime. No matter how many times our authorities, transgender activists and UNESCO tell us otherwise, teaching our children in schools about transgenderism is child abuse. We can no longer be silent.

Russia came under much fire for its law banning the propagation of non-traditional sexuality to minors, which was characterized in the West, by European Courts as “illegal”. While it is first of all incredible that European Courts – which do not have universal jurisdiction, think to tell Russia what is illegal on Russian soil, it is important to note the so-called “gay-ban” does NOT violate international law, and was in fact not intended to discriminate against homosexuals.

The law was made in order to prevent the propagation of dangerous, non-traditional values to children. No one is preventing gays from having thoughts, or from living, and Russian authorities are not threatening them with violence, it was simply a matter of what content Children should be shown.

Children should not be sexualized in any way, as it is perverted and vile to bring sexual content to minors. They should be allowed to reach maturity before being bombarded with a hypersexualized world.

That is exactly what UNESCO is presenting children, a world in which they will be taught to question if their own sex corresponds to their gender. Is that really what children should be taught – I think not.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Latest

James Woods Suspended From Twitter Over Satirical Meme That Could “Impact An Election”

James Woods crushes Jack Dorsey: “You are a coward, @Jack.”

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


Outspoken conservative actor James Woods was suspended from posting to Twitter over a two-month-old satirical meme which very clearly parodies a Democratic advertisement campaign. While the actor’s tweets are still visible, he is unable to post new content.

The offending tweet from July 20, features three millennial-aged men with “nu-male smiles” and text that reads “We’re making a Woman’s Vote Worth more by staying home.” Above it, Woods writes “Pretty scary that there is a distinct possibility this could be real. Not likely, but in this day and age of absolute liberal insanity, it is at least possible.”

According to screenshots provided by an associate of Woods’, Twitter directed the actor to delete the post on the grounds that it contained “text and imagery that has the potential to be misleading in a way that could impact an election.

In other words, James Woods, who has approximately 1.72 million followers, was suspended because liberals who don’t identify as women might actually take the meme seriously and not vote. 

In a statement released through associate Sara Miller, Woods said “You are a coward, @Jack,” referring to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. “There is no free speech for Conservatives on @Twitter.

Earlier this month, Woods opined on the mass-platform ban of Alex Jones, tweeting: ““I’ve never read Alex Jones nor watched any of his video presence on the internet. A friend told me he was an extremist. Believe me that I know nothing about him. That said, I think banning him from the internet is a slippery slope. This is the beginning of real fascism. Trust me.”

Nu-males everywhere non-threateningly smirk at Woods’ bad fortune…

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

This Man’s Incredible Story Proves Why Due Process Matters In The Kavanaugh Case

Accused of rape by a fellow student, Brian Banks accepted a plea deal and went to prison on his 18th birthday. Years later he was exonerated.

The Duran

Published

on

Authored by James Miller of The Political Insider:


Somewhere between the creation of the Magna Carta and now, leftists have forgotten why due process matters; and in some cases, such as that of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, they choose to outright ignore the judicial and civil rights put in place by the U.S. Constitution.

In this age of social media justice mobs, the accused are often convicted in the court of (liberal) public opinion long before any substantial evidence emerges to warrant an investigation or trial. This is certainly true for Kavanaugh. His accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, cannot recall the date of the alleged assault and has no supporting witnesses, yet law professors are ready to ruin his entire life and career. Not because they genuinely believe he’s guilty, but because he’s a pro-life Trump nominee for the Supreme Court.

It goes without saying: to “sink Kavanaugh even if” Ford’s allegation is untrue is unethical, unconstitutional, and undemocratic. He has a right to due process, and before liberals sharpen their pitchforks any further they would do well to remember what happened to Brian Banks.

In the summer of 2002, Banks was a highly recruited 16-year-old linebacker at Polytechnic High School in California with plans to play football on a full scholarship to the University of Southern California. However, those plans were destroyed when Banks’s classmate, Wanetta Gibson, claimed that Banks had dragged her into a stairway at their high school and raped her.

Gibson’s claim was false, but it was Banks’s word against hers. Banks had two options: go to trial and risk spending 41 years-to-life in prison, or take a plea deal that included five years in prison, five years probation, and registering as a sex offender. Banks accepted the plea deal under the counsel of his lawyer, who told him that he stood no chance at trial because the all-white jury would “automatically assume” he was guilty because he was a “big, black teenager.”

Gibson and her mother subsequently sued the Long Beach Unified School District and won a $1.5 million settlement. It wasn’t until nearly a decade later, long after Banks’s promising football career had already been tanked, that Gibson admitted she’d fabricated the entire story.

Following Gibson’s confession, Banks was exonerated with the help of the California Innocence Project. Hopeful to get his life back on track, he played for Las Vegas Locomotives of the now-defunct United Football League in 2012 and signed with the Atlanta Falcons in 2013. But while Banks finally received justice, he will never get back the years or the prospective pro football career that Gibson selfishly stole from him.

Banks’ story is timely, and it serves as a powerful warning to anyone too eager to condemn those accused of sexual assault. In fact, a film about Banks’s ordeal, Brian Banks, is set to premiere at the Los Angeles Film Festival next week.

Perhaps all the #MeToo Hollywood elites and their liberal friends should attend the screening – and keep Kavanaugh in their minds as they watch.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

“Transphobic” Swedish Professor May Lose Job After Noting Biological Differences Between Sexes

A university professor in Sweden is under investigation after he said that there are fundamental differences between men and women which are “biologically founded”

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


A university professor in Sweden is under investigation for “anti-feminism” and “transphobia” after he said that there are fundamental differences between men and women which are “biologically founded” and that genders cannot be regarded as “social constructs alone,” reports Academic Rights Watch.

For his transgression, Germund Hesslow – a professor of neuroscience at Lund University – who holds dual PhDs in philosophy and neurophysiology, may lose his job – telling RT that a “full investigation” has been ordered, and that there “have been discussions about trying to stop the lecture or get rid of me, or have someone else give the lecture or not give the lecture at all.”

“If you answer such a question you are under severe time pressure, you have to be extremely brief — and I used wording which I think was completely innocuous, and that apparently the student didn’t,” Hesslow said.

Hesslow was ordered to attend a meeting by Christer Larsson, chairman of the program board for medical education, after a female student complained that Hesslow had a “personal anti-feminist agenda.” He was asked to distance himself from two specific comments; that gay women have a “male sexual orientation” and that the sexual orientation of transsexuals is “a matter of definition.”

The student’s complaint reads in part (translated):

I have also heard from senior lecturers that Germund Hesslow at the last lecture expressed himself transfobically. In response to a question of transexuallism, he said something like “sex change is a fly”. Secondly, it is outrageous because there may be students during the lecture who are themselves exposed to transfobin, but also because it may affect how later students in their professional lives meet transgender people. Transpersonals already have a high level of overrepresentation in suicide statistics and there are already major shortcomings in the treatment of transgender in care, should not it be countered? How does this kind of statement coincide with the university’s equal treatment plan? What has this statement given for consequences? What has been done for this to not be repeated? –Academic Rights Watch

After being admonished, Hesslow refused to distance himself from his comments, saying that he had “done enough” already and didn’t have to explain and defend his choice of words.

At some point, one must ask for a sense of proportion among those involved. If it were to become acceptable for students to record lectures in order to find compromising formulations and then involve faculty staff with meetings and long letters, we should let go of the medical education altogether,” Hesslow said in a written reply to Larsson.

He also rejected the accusation that he had a political agenda – stating that his only agenda was to let scientific factnot new social conventions, dictate how he teaches his courses.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending